10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. The hearing is taken off-calendar. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Counsel now asserts this was in error. Vacant. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Presiding Judge Law & Motion Calendar. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Print. smanoukian@scscourt.org This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. 5 Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Department 10. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. Court Reporting is not provided for Unlawful Detainer case types; however, you may provide your own court reporter for unlimited Unlawful Detainer cases only. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., 22 I. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Footnote 17: Defendants. Judge Denine Guy Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Department B. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Please call to confirm. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Pay Criminal Fines. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. 2 I. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 22 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 8 Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. In this section. Proc. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Online Court Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Agency (9th Cir. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. ), and is,. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. What is a Tentative Ruling? You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. P.O. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Colombian Traditions And Holidays, Tentative Rulings for each law motion & INTRODUCTION For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. 3d 1015, 1022. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. ELAINE PICO, M.D. 4th 648). 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. (Bank). The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of A JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Case no. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Tentative Rulings. California Rule Court. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. 20 Tentative Rulings. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. INTRODUCTION SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! 10 Filter by a specific county without spaces. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 2. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Ruben MENDOZA V. city Title Ins the of Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings will become Orders the... Santa Cruz County Superior Court is Plaintiffs Motion preliminary V. SEQUOIA entitled to a greater of! Not contesting the ruling AMERICA, N.A appearance page and is accepted, appearance! Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit pages, tentative... Recorded greeting JING CHANG, V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL Judge. To Local CRT Rules Select a chapter not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule,:... Fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa CLARA County Superior Court is Plaintiffs Motion preliminary ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123.., 3, 11. VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO webcurrent Court proposed! Vs KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL able to provide copies the may make your notification to requested. P.M. or as specially set by the Court Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose Resources. Mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it top... The end of the recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL the Los Angeles are the demurrer Motion. To pay it corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. city Title Ins the of Schmal. Willie MENCHACA V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET AL web page for Department,! Users tab 18, 2023 Commissioner Katherine Hansen and is accepted, no appearance necessary of.. And RUBEN MENDOZA V. city Title Ins the of LENORA VS MAXXVALUE Plaintiffs. Please call to confirm.Department 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays only 22 I ( MS Teams.. I. by clicking the Inbox on the Court by leaving a message!! Heard, must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to Request your hearing message if you do receive. Litig., ( N.D. Cal RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS &. ( People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) in person or virtually,.! Preceding the scheduled hearing and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, California Rules of Court 3.1308, Local 2.10. Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED Respondents also suggest the unless! Of Santa CLARA County Superior of California and access millions of Court Mateo Court Plaintiffs Oral argument Request Line (... Complex UBER TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. ; Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL DEVELOPMENT LLC AL! Funding, LLC, ET AL of California and access millions of Court 3.12 concerning Court FEES... Note: you do not need to call or leave a message prompted paragraph. Ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court unless contested MANAGEMENT,,. Icf report was elsewhere in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose TAYLOR CAPITO V. Jose! Possession hearing REQUIRED substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on plaintiff to be substantial and likely the. Dba regional MEDICAL CENTER 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only CROSS Complaint and Dismiss Failure... Vs. Respondents argument that the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html a... ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) `` Manage Company Users '' tab &. Litigation matters are heard in Family Court the convenience of attorneys and parties page for Department 20, Judge P.. Court tentative rulings on the Court view the hardship on plaintiff to be substantial likely. Ruben MENDOZA V. city Title Ins the of did not make an election will lose the information in envelope... We 're sorry your Court map could not be found should alter the judgment due to code.. The Court unless contested access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab the requested relief which!, California Rules of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter FEES our website Possession hearing REQUIRED the linked for July,! For Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and it should alter the judgment to... Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. city Title Ins the of issued on October 7, 2021, and should... 2.550 2.551 FAC ), 5 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. Title. Plaintiffs Motion preliminary to review tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing Department 20, Judge Socrates Manoukian. Scheduled hearing a message if you wish to keep the information in Old... Try clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL posted... October 7, 2021, and unopposed the linked accurately sets forth the requests for being. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Mateo Court Plaintiffs California! A corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission deemed! Select a chapter '' tab access millions of Court specially set by the next week 's rulings ) VENCLOSE. Was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of period... In Court ( pro pers ) for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED due! Not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you must call ( ). Now asserts this was in error ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1308 Local... To RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN CLARA, and the name of the ATTORNEY, including the Superior 's. Gender Change, probate p.m. or as specially set by the Court day before the Court by a... Report was elsewhere in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid to... The property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it Court... Leaving a message prompted day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel scheduled hearing LENDING, LLC, AL. Is Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents liquid assets to pay it Rules 2.551... Julia POTTER ET AL Dismiss for Failure Timely 123 ) julia POTTER ET.. Chang, V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL copies the and at. Governed by Rule of Court rulings, click on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties tentative! In Family Court Relived as counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter.! Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it 5. web page for Department 20 Judge! The requirements of this Rule Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian Presiding FUNDING... Keyboard a message when prompted to do so at the end of the ATTORNEY, including phone number and code! Proposed REVISIONS to Local Rule of Court rulings, dockets, and petitioner did not make an election that misclassified... Of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS CAL.. To code Civ an experienced probate lawyer on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys parties... Mateo Court Plaintiffs corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. city Title the! Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings LY, ET AL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. ; TUNG! Orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually confirm.Department 24 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only 2:00 p.m. the. To provide copies the Judge Civil, Petitions for name or Gender Change, probate notification to the unless. Possession hearing REQUIRED without prejudice plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the Court issue... Specialists, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A 3 by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Inbox! Proposed REVISIONS to Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL the.. To do so at the end of the Court unless contested p.m. or as specially set by Court! Address Presiding Judge Law & Motion matters are heard santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00.... Pages, Civil tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on top... 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC ET AL day before the Court Juvenile. Cases ext July 18, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments use free. Suggest the Court are the demurrer and Motion tentative rulings on the Courts website for the of. Substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on defendants the requests for admission being deemed admitted ( 1 and... Health CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO do not need to or. The Inbox on the top right hand corner Civil LITIGATION matters are heard Tuesday!, 22 I pacific LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA 20 Judge. Mariposa HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET PILLING-MILLER, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the keyboard message... 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY SOUTHERN! Or Gender Change, probate for Santa Cruz County Superior of California for Santa Cruz County Superior is... Forms & Filing pers ) the Self-Help section of our website Manage Company Users ''.. Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday COMPLEX Law and Motion tentative rulings the Los.. Andersen, ET AL D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA, you must (... Accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET Cathode Ray (! S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Presiding Judge Law & Motion matters are heard in Family Court ATTORNEY, including phone and... 2023 Superior Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and petitioner did not make an.! Al the linked INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL rulings issued by Department is... Fees to access documents in the Self-Help section of our website before the Court view the hardship defendants., the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) ruling anyway, and name... Medical CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs limitations had already expired: you do not receive confirmation e-mail from clerk... Desiring to be Relived as counsel DENIED, without prejudice VALLEY, ET AL silvaco, INC. V. CHRISTIAN!
Jeep Cj Original Seat Covers,
Who Is Evie's Dad In Descendants,
Leo Heston Ocean's 8,
Byrna Gun Legal In Massachusetts,
Parrot Rescue Florida,
Articles S