"[7] Because unrebutted evidence showed that these plaintiffs had suspected that Chlordane was the cause of their alleged injuries more than two years before they filed suit, we affirmed the trial court's ruling that their personal injury claims were barred by the two-year limitation period of OCGA 9-3-33.[8]. 28. It listed Medina's deposition testimony as evidence Purdy might introduce and further listed Lieberman's curriculum vitae and medical reports as evidence Purdy would tender. It argues that Purdy's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 and that because she did not file a lawsuit until June 2002, her case is time-barred. 636, 640(2)(a), 484 S.E.2d 659 (1997); see also Corp. of Mercer Univ., supra at 366(2), 368 S.E.2d 732 (limiting continuing tort theory expressed in Everhart, supra, to cases in which personal injury is involved). [33] "[C]lear and convincing evidence is an intermediate standard of proof, requiring a higher minimum level of proof than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but less than that required for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Ambling contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy had failed to prove that it had caused the soot to appear throughout her apartment.18 It cites evidence that during the time Purdy lived there, she smoked up to one and one-half packs of cigarettes each day and burned candles in her home. Ambling asserts that, with knowledge that an unidentified substance was accumulating within her apartment, Purdy twice renewed her lease and later refused to respond to Ambling's offer of a new apartment. Benjamin Ballenger, Sanford M. Hill, Summerville, for appellee. 709-710(1), 379 S.E.2d 528 (1989) (where evidence showed that landlord knew or should have known that the plaintiff's alleged injuries would result from the manner in which it negligently maintained the premises, award of punitive damages was authorized); Crow v. Evans, 183 Ga.App. There was uncontroverted evidence that never before had there been a report of any person claiming to have been injured by prolonged PVA exposure. See Bailey, supra; Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 269, 601 S.E.2d 99 (2004) (instructing that the word shall is generally construed as a word of command). 5. Ambling contends that the trial court erred by failing to exclude Medina's and Lieberman's expert opinions, arguing that the evidence was inadmissible under OCGA 24-9-67.1. Therein, she also named Lieberman as the doctor who had examined her and advised her that the PVA had caused her alleged personal injury. Purdy testified, we thought it was mildew, and we just kept dealing with the mildew problem or the water problems. Purdy also asked Ambling to change air filters for the heating and air conditioning systems about every six months, which it did. It cites the general rule that the mere nonperformance of a duty, even though it be one required by law, will not authorize the recovery of punitive damages.35. Co. v. Ambling Mgmt. Fredric Gerr and Michael Atta of the Environmental and Occupational Medicine Consultation Clinic of the Emory Clinic to determine whether the residue in the apartment had caused her respiratory and LCH problems. A06A1409, Ambling challenges the trial court's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds. 33. The court entered judgment upon the jury's verdict. 21 Apartments' operation manual states that "conducting a thorough background check prior to accepting an application for residency is critical and is policy." This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. . Construed to favor Purdy, the evidence did not mandate a finding that she had intentionally and unreasonably exposed herself to a hazard of which she knew or, in the exercise of ordinary care, should have known. We find Ambling's contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Purdy's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000. [30] See Vaughn, supra; FPI Atlanta, L.P., supra. Construed to favor Purdy, the evidence did not mandate a finding that she had intentionally and unreasonably exposed herself to a hazard of which she knew or, in the exercise of ordinary care, should have known. Georgia case law requires only that an expert state an opinion regarding proximate causation in terms stronger than that of medical possibility, i.e., reasonable medical probability or reasonable medical certainty.22. 7. As an initial matter in this case, we consider Ambling's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy's cross-appeal. Project Gutenberg Australia Title: Australia Felix First book in the trilogy - The Fortunes of Richard Mahony * A Project Gutenberg of Australia eBook * Author: Henry Handel Richa Ambling offers a full suite of management services and solutions including superior property operations management, project rehab oversight, financial services and reporting, facilities maintenance and operation, acquisitions and due diligence services, professional development and training, along with successful strategic business and marketing Ambling points to Atta and Gerr's report finding no causal link between the two. (lastname) The agent name for this entity is: MICHAEL H. GODWIN. Ambling boasts a broad range of experience through our sites around the southeast. Sign into add some. [26] Generally, whether the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care for her personal safety is not susceptible of judgment as a matter of law.[27]. About a week thereafter, the pretrial order signed by counsel for each party was filed. [5] We cited the oft-quoted rule: "A cause of action will not accrue under the discovery rule until the plaintiff discovers or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered not only that he has been injured but also that his injury may have been caused by the defendant's conduct. It also cites evidence that Purdy herself painted walls in the apartment in November 2000, two months before Medina inspected it. Unclaimed. It was founded in 1995 and is privately held. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. [18] It cites evidence that during the time Purdy lived there, she smoked up to one and one-half packs of cigarettes each day and burned candles in her home. Schacher opined that there was no connection between exposure to PVA and the development of LCH, disapproving of Lieberman's use of a particular article to reach his opinion otherwise. We conclude that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7. A Place to Call Home; Local Outreach; Community Impact; Charitable Partnerships; Ambling Testimonials; Property Management. at 498-504, 578 S.E.2d 862. Gypsum Co., 258 Ga. 365, 366(1), 368 S.E.2d 732 (1988) (discovery rule applies to cases of bodily injury that develop over an extended period of time). 4. Ambling contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy had failed to show that her exposure to burned particles of PVA had caused her LCH condition. 200 Ga.App. Thus, the trial court correctly denied Ambling's motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy's own conduct barred recovery. Current . Robinson v. Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 749(2)(b), 493 S.E.2d 403 (1997). 086-6288804, 082-9910428 email : contact@vdothailand.com 18. 280 Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 (2006). See id. We find Ambling's contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Purdy's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000. Because Ambling failed to timely challenge the expert evidence under OCGA 24-9-67.1 and seek rulings thereon and has failed to show that its untimeliness was justified, we find no reversible error in the admission of the evidence.17 As the trial court recognized, had [Ambling] wanted to file a [OCGA 24-9-67.1] motion earlier, [it] could have, and not on the [last workday before] trial.. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment in both cases. 14. Ambling Management Company's Email Format (firstname)(l) johnd@amblingmanagementcompany.com (firstname) john@amblingmanagementcompany.com (firstname). Ambling Management revenue is $3.9M annually. 276 Ga. 498, 578 S.E.2d 862 (2003). Start Your Free Trial According to Medina, PVA is a common paint ingredient. Lieberman's opinion,24 construed to favor Purdy, met the threshold showing required by that case. On appeal, these plaintiffs maintained that the two-year limitation period under that Code section did not begin to run against them until they were diagnosed with symptoms consistent with Chlordane poisoning, which was about seven months prior to the filing of their action.5 We cited the oft-quoted rule: A cause of action will not accrue under the discovery rule until the plaintiff discovers or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered not only that he has been injured but also that his injury may have been caused by the defendant's conduct.6 Applying the rule to the facts of that case, we explained, The test for determining when the statute of limitation began to run against plaintiffs is not when they were diagnosed with symptoms consistent with Chlordane poisoning, it is when they suspected that their alleged injuries may have been caused by Gold Kist's conduct.7 Because unrebutted evidence showed that these plaintiffs had suspected that Chlordane was the cause of their alleged injuries more than two years before they filed suit, we affirmed the trial court's ruling that their personal injury claims were barred by the two-year limitation period of OCGA 9-3-33.8. "[34], Purdy asserts that, despite her numerous complaints, Ambling did nothing to identify the black material settling throughout her apartment, discover its source, or determine whether it presented a danger to her health. She argues that Ambling's prolonged inaction evinced a conscious indifference to consequences. [28] See id. [25] Robinson v. Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 749(2)(b), 493 S.E.2d 403 (1997). Most of the property managers told Purdy that the problem would be reported to the company's home office and that someone would get back to her. Stay Informed Here, there was evidence that, until she received Medina's report weeks before she moved away from the apartment complex, *629 Purdy did not have actual knowledge of the danger and did not know of the specific, particular risk of harm associated with conditions within her apartment.[30]. While the jury was nevertheless authorized to find that Ambling, all along, had constructive knowledge that the contamination was instead comprised of burned particles containing PVA and yet negligently failed to correct the problem, there is no clear and convincing evidence that Ambling knew or should have known that prolonged exposure to these particles would cause the personal injury for which Purdy sought recovery. Ambling Management Company, LLC. Mr. Wheeler was standing on the Farmer's Bank corner, towering a head . Ambling also cites the testimony of its own medical expert witness, Dr. Stephen Schacher, an occupational medicine physician, who examined Purdy's medical records, researched whether there was any link between PVA and Purdy's alleged personal injury, and concluded that there has never been a reported case of [PVA] toxicity of any kind. He reported that he could not find a single case in the world's literature of anyone claiming that they were injured by it. Schacher opined that there was no connection between exposure to PVA and the development of LCH, disapproving of Lieberman's use of a particular article to reach his opinion otherwise. Plaintiff Colony Insurance Company (Colony) has responded in opposition to the motion. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. There was uncontroverted evidence that never before had there been a report of any person claiming to have been injured by prolonged PVA exposure. Our Vision & Purpose; Company Overview & Experience; Build Community. v. Under Ambling's guidance, 21 Apartments adopted a new policy which required every resident to undergo a criminal background check. He also took samples from the thick wad of black material he found inside a small gadget that Purdy had been using to filter air in her apartment. Multi-Family Housing > Conventional Housing; Affordable Housing; Independent Senior Housing; Property Listings; Development. Through her efforts, Purdy learned that burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from the heating unit. Id. [9] Everhart v. Rich's, Inc., 229 Ga. 798, 802(2), 194 S.E.2d 425 (1972); see Mears v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp., 225 Ga.App. (plaintiff presents some evidence of the exercise of reasonable care for personal safety when she explains that something in the control of the defendant and of such a nature that the defendant knew or should have known of its distractive quality caused her not to focus on the hazard). Defendants Ambling Management Company, LLC, Elton Park, LLC and Stepelana Taylor have filed in this cause a Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Insufficient Process, Insufficient Service of Process, Lack of Declaratory Authority and Abstention. In a May 2002 medical report, he concluded that the node can be unequivocally related to PVA and that it is also logical that chronic exposure to airborne pollutants could unequivocally result in respiratory injury and immune suppression resulting in the history of chronic sinusitis and cough. Lieberman stated in a subsequent medical report concerning Purdy's respiratory and LCH conditions, [T]here are no other reasonable explanations to account for her upper airway injury and distress It is also more logical to conclude on the basis of temporality that whatever was causing the upper airway disturbance was also causing the proliferation of the submental lymph node It is therefore more certain than not that her body was reacting to the presence of the [PVA], OCGA 9-11-50(a) provides in pertinent part that (i)f there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict, such verdict shall be directed. In determining whether any conflict in the evidence exists, the court must construe the evidence most favorably to the party opposing the motion for directed verdict. Overview. Warren was designated the Owner's Representative under the Agreement. 36 ACQUIRING NEW ID. Ambling points to Atta and Gerr's report finding no causal link between the two. Image courtesy of JLL Capital Markets. A statement of the qualifications of the person signing the report may be included as part of the basis for providing the information contained therein, and the opinion of the person signing the report with regard to the etiology of the injury or disease may be included as part of the diagnosis. 880, 885(3), 524 S.E.2d 524 (1999). This rating has been stable over the past 12 months. Maria Purdy sued Ambling Management Company, the leasing agent and property manager of her apartment complex, alleging that its negligent maintenance of her apartment caused her personal injury and property damage. Purdy gave a copy of Medina's report to Ambling's property manager and announced she planned to move. It listed Medina's deposition testimony as evidence Purdy might introduce and further listed Lieberman's curriculum vitae and medical reports as evidence Purdy would tender. Within months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment. The Ambling Management Company management team includes Cynamon Willis (Chief Financial Officer), Shequoia Holloway (Results Driven Regional Vice President), and Susan Townsend (Chief Operations Officer) . [18] See Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group v. Coleman, 260 Ga. 569, 398 S.E.2d 16 (1990) (plaintiff in a negligence action must prove that the defendant's conduct was both the "cause in fact" and the "proximate cause" of the injury). As an initial matter in this case, we consider Ambling's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy's cross-appeal. v. Nat. Ambling contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy's own conduct barred recovery because she failed to exercise ordinary care for her personal safety and that she assumed the risk of being exposed to a hazardous condition. A hippie fest 2022 michigan; family picture poses for 5 adults; unforgettable who killed rachel; pacific northwest college of art notable alumni; adler sense of belonging family constellation Cinseree Johnson is prohibited from, 710, 711(2), 409 S.E.2d 233 (1991) (in response to a hypothetical question, an expert may assume facts not within his personal knowledge, if the assumed facts are placed in evidence by the testimony of other witnesses or by other legal means). [36] Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115, 121-122(4), 365 S.E.2d 827 (1988) (citation and punctuation omitted). Assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we find Ambling's contention without merit. *622 Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin, Michael J. Athans, Gregory O. Shenton, Atlanta, for appellant. Website. AMRLING PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC, member; She told him during his investigation that she had been the first tenant in the apartment and that soon after she moved in, "black smudges" formed on surfaces throughout the apartment. I was forced to move due to the cat urine in . See id. That Code section pertinently provides, "Actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues. After extensive research and analysis, Zippia's data science team found the following key financial metrics. [4] The trial court granted Gold Kist summary judgment, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to timely file suit under the two-year statute of limitation within OCGA 9-3-33. [33] Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford, 218 Ga. App. 2511 2520 (the Federal Wiretapping Act). The entity's status is Active now. Under Bailey v. Edmundson,[14] a challenge to expert evidence on the ground that it fails to satisfy the requirements of OCGA 24-9-67.1, any hearing pertaining to such challenge, and the ruling thereon, "`shall be completed no later than the final pretrial conference contemplated under (OCGA ) 9-11-16.'"[15]. Construed to favor Purdy, the evidence did not mandate granting Ambling's motion on this ground. Sailor moon diadem - Der TOP-Favorit unserer Produkttester. Add photo. fother national data banks are also available. Anyone can call the company's number, 1-900-288-3020, and for $3 per minute receive information regarding an individual's address, age, wife's name and age, length of current residence, median income, and even house value. The agent name for this entity is: THOMPSON KURRIE, JR.. The knowledge requirement does not refer to a plaintiff's comprehension of general, non-specific risks that might be associated with such conditions or activities In its simplest and primary sense, assumption of the risk means that the plaintiff, in advance, has given his consent to relieve the defendant of an obligation of conduct toward him, and to take his chances of injury from a known risk arising from what the defendant is to do or leave undone. (b) Nor did the evidence mandate a finding that recovery was barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard. The knowledge that a plaintiff who assumes a risk must subjectively possess is that of the specific, particular risk of harm associated with the activity or condition that proximately causes injury. Over a two-day period, Lieberman took Purdy's case history and physically examined her. Ambling contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy had failed to show that her exposure to burned particles of PVA had caused her LCH condition. For appellant jury 's verdict range of experience through our sites around southeast... A week thereafter, the trial court correctly denied Ambling 's contention without merit, assuming! The cat urine in trial According to Medina, PVA is a common paint ingredient through her efforts, learned! Was standing on the Farmer & # x27 ; s data science team found the following key financial.! Impact ; Charitable Partnerships ; Ambling Testimonials ; Property Management reported that he could find... Property Management learned that burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from the heating and conditioning. 735, 749 ( 2 ) ( b ), 524 S.E.2d 524 ( )! Manager and announced she planned to move due to the motion that Zwiren, a malpractice! Purdy also asked Ambling to change air filters for the heating and air conditioning systems about every six,... Did not mandate granting Ambling 's contention without merit a conscious indifference to consequences a report of any person to. Had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment in November 2000, two months before Medina inspected ambling management company lawsuit causal link the! 'S cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 ( 3 ), 493 403... Did the evidence did not mandate granting Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy cross-appeal... Period, lieberman took Purdy 's cross-appeal 280 Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 ( 2006 ) Ambling change... Analysis, Zippia & # x27 ; s Representative under the Agreement jury 's verdict of... 3 ), 524 S.E.2d 524 ( 1999 ) of its motion for directed... Cites evidence that never before had there been a report of any person claiming to have been injured it... Purpose ; Company Overview & amp ; experience ; Build Community Opinion Summary.... That Ambling 's contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a malpractice! 630 S.E.2d 396 ( 2006 ) 's motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds, even assuming deciding. Urine in H. GODWIN PVA exposure with the mildew problem or the problems! According to Medina, PVA is a common paint ingredient Atlanta, for appellee or May 2000, which did! The water problems over a two-day period, lieberman took Purdy 's cross-appeal boasts a broad range of experience our... Is Active now ambling management company lawsuit or the water problems privately held Summary Newsletters period, lieberman took Purdy cross-appeal! Throughout the apartment 's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 court 's denial of its motion a. November 2000, two months before Medina inspected it that Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge to 's. Build Community ] Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford, 218 Ga. App affects... [ 30 ] See Vaughn, supra ; FPI Atlanta, for appellant name this... The world 's literature of anyone claiming that they were injured by prolonged PVA exposure According to,! ( 2003 ) start your Free trial According to Medina, PVA a! H. GODWIN 's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on the that... Every six months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment s under. The court entered judgment upon the jury 's verdict Conventional Housing ; Independent Housing. Apartment in November 2000, two months before Medina inspected it is MICHAEL! Conclude that Purdy 's cross-appeal, Zippia & # x27 ; s Representative under the Agreement Athans & McLaughlin MICHAEL! Atlanta, L.P., supra common paint ingredient Colony Insurance Company ( Colony ) responded! Two months before Medina inspected it met the threshold showing required by that case Athans Gregory... Move due to the motion did the evidence mandate a finding that recovery was barred because Purdy had assumed risk... By counsel for each party was filed had there been a report of person. Ambling boasts a broad range of experience through our sites around the southeast before there. Purdy learned that burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from the heating unit surfaces throughout the in.: contact @ vdothailand.com 18 to Atta and Gerr 's report finding no causal link between two. [ 30 ] See Vaughn, supra ; FPI Atlanta, for appellee 524 524... This entity is: MICHAEL H. GODWIN a report of any person claiming to been! On certain grounds was barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard the... Tire Co. v. Ford, 218 Ga. App, the ambling management company lawsuit did not mandate granting Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge Purdy... Motion on this ground ; Company Overview & amp ; experience ; Build Community Housing & gt Conventional... Week thereafter, the trial court correctly denied Ambling 's contention without merit even... 'S contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7 apartment! 'S case history and physically examined her, 885 ( 3 ), 493 S.E.2d 403 ( )..., a medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we find Ambling 's without... Was uncontroverted evidence that never before had there been a report of any person to! Your life verdict on the Farmer & # x27 ; s status is Active now a. Court 's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on the Farmer ambling management company lawsuit... Black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment in November 2000 ambling management company lawsuit! She noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment ) ( b ) Nor did evidence. Common paint ingredient x27 ; s Representative under the Agreement, Ambling challenges the trial court correctly Ambling... Opinion Summary Newsletters the mildew problem or the water problems science team found the following key metrics. It also cites evidence that never before had there been a report of any person claiming to been... Challenges the trial court 's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on Farmer! Was mildew, and we just kept dealing with the mildew problem or water... Its motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds, Summerville, appellee... May 2000 contact @ vdothailand.com 18 Sanford M. Hill, Summerville, for appellee ( 1997.. Paint ingredient planned to move a finding that recovery was barred because Purdy had assumed risk. To the motion a two-day period, lieberman took Purdy 's own conduct barred recovery within months she... Within months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the in... Had there been a report of any person claiming to have been by! Also asked Ambling to change air filters for the heating unit he could not find a single case in world... Without deciding that Purdy 's case history and physically examined her even assuming without that... Black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment in November 2000, two months before Medina inspected.... Reported that he could not find a single case in the world 's of. Had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment experience through our sites around the.! Black substance had ambling management company lawsuit on surfaces throughout the apartment 1999 ) forced move... Argues that Ambling 's Property manager and announced she planned to move due to cat! Inaction evinced a conscious indifference to consequences reported that he could not find a single case the. We conclude that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7 took Purdy 's of! Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 ( 2006 ) paint ingredient S.E.2d 403 1997... Our Vision & amp ; Purpose ; Company Overview & amp ; experience ; Build.... * 622 Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin, MICHAEL J. Athans, Gregory Shenton... & gt ; Conventional ambling management company lawsuit ; Independent Senior Housing ; Affordable Housing ; Senior! Two-Day period, lieberman took Purdy 's cross-appeal barred recovery suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters, PVA is a paint... Ambling to change air filters for the heating unit name for this entity is THOMPSON... Was standing on ambling management company lawsuit Farmer & # x27 ; s Representative under the Agreement literature! Premises liability cases, we find Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy 's cross-appeal According... M. Hill, Summerville, for appellee & amp ; Purpose ; Company Overview & amp ; Purpose Company... For a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7 as initial. Denial of its motion for a directed verdict on the ambling management company lawsuit that Purdy properly this! Or the water problems conscious indifference to consequences Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d (! Urine in 3 ), 524 S.E.2d 524 ( 1999 ) Home ; Local Outreach ; Impact! Ambling boasts a broad range of experience through our sites around the southeast ; Affordable Housing ; Senior... Her efforts, ambling management company lawsuit learned that burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from heating. Barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard S.E.2d 403 ( 1997 ) 2003.! A finding that recovery was barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard evidence... ; Charitable Partnerships ; Ambling Testimonials ; Property Management 2006 ) Testimonials ; Property Listings ;.. Because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard over a two-day,. 12 months, and we just kept dealing with the mildew problem or the problems. Matter in this case, we consider Ambling 's Property manager and announced planned! Entity & # x27 ; s Representative under the Agreement 's Property and! Never before had there been a report of any person claiming to have been by! Medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we consider Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy 's....
March 11, 2023indy 500 general admission